Posts Tagged Rick Boucher

The Carbon Nine

Posted by Josh on Thursday, 28 May, 2009

Jonathon Hiskes has a must read piece at Grist:

Imagine the 435 members of the U.S. House of Representatives standing in a single line, from the most likely to support climate change legislation to the least likely. At the far “green” end, i.e. most inclined to vote for greenhouse gas restrictions, you’d find Seattle Democrat Jim McDermott. At the far “brown” end, Texas Republican/libertarian Ron Paul.

Predictably, most Republicans would stand nearer to Paul’s end. Most Democrats would stand closer to McDermott. In the exact center, according to recent work by two economists, are nine lawmakers. And if the Waxman-Markey climate bill receives a full House vote, any one of them could provide the 218th “yes”—the decisive vote that passes the bill.

Let’s call them the Carbon Nine: Jason Altmire (Pennsylvania), Rick Boucher (Virginia), Artur Davis (Alabama), Baron Hill (Indiana), Charlie Melancon (Louisiana), Earl Pomeroy (North Dakota), Mike Ross (Arkansas), John Tanner (Tennessee), and Gene Taylor (Mississippi).


Young & Old Vs. Politicians & Coal

Posted by Josh on Friday, 22 May, 2009

From Campus Progress on Youtube:

Congress is failing us in delivering a science based climate bill and people from throughout the nation. Some of us in the Nation’s Capital went to Rick Boucher (D-VA), one of the second largest recipient of coal money in congress, to express our disappointment in person. Check out these inspiring voices standing for reason in the midst of corruption and slander.


Activists Stike Back at Boucher for Weakening Climate Bill, Block Access to his Office

Posted by Josh on Thursday, 21 May, 2009

Media advisory via email:

WHAT: Dozens of concerned citizens will peacefully block the entrance to Virginia Congressman Boucher’s office at noon on Thursday May 21st to protest his efforts to block strong climate legislation. Congressman Boucher has personally driven efforts in Congress to give away billions of dollars worth of free permits directly to coal, oil and other dirty fossil fuel companies under a cap and trade bill. Instead of free handouts, protesters support President Obama’s campaign pledge to auction 100 percent of the carbon permits and rebate most of the money to consumers.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, giving free allocations under a cap and trade program will raise the total cost of the program and hurt poor Americans the most. On Thursday, activists will be risking arrest in order to shine a spotlight on how Boucher’s handouts to the coal industry will hurt working families and diminish efforts to fight global warming.

WHERE: Congressman Rick Boucher’s office – Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2187

WHEN: Thursday, May 21st at 12 PM

WHO: Organized by the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, an advocacy group that works to fight global warming in Virginia, Maryland, and DC

VISUALS: Activists, many of whom will be risking arrest, will carry banners and a giant check made out to the “Coal Industry”


Major Compromise on Clean Energy and Green Jobs Bill

Posted by Josh on Wednesday, 13 May, 2009

Roll Call is reporting that Representatives Waxman (D-CA) and Boucher (D-VA) have reached an agreement on several critical provisions of the American Clean Energy and Security Act. The article also confirms roughly what was expected in terms of timeline:

“We have resolved a good number of the issues,” Waxman said after a meeting with committee Democrats, adding that the bill remains on track to clear his panel next week. Opening statements are planned for Thursday with a marathon markup beginning on Monday.

“I am optimistic. I believe we will have the votes to pass the bill [next week],” Waxman said.

Sadly, in order to secure the votes he needed from his own party, Representative Waxman was forced to compromise on some key provisions of the legislation.

Emission Reduction by 2020 Renewable Electricity Standard Pollution Permit Allocations
May 12th Compromise 17% Below 2005 Levels by 2020 15% Renewable and 5% Efficiency Gains, Governors can adjust to 12% Renewable and 8% Efficiency Gains Most will be Given Away to Polluters Free of Charge
Original Discussion Draft 20% below 2005 Levels by 2020 25% Renewable by 2025 Not Specified
What Obama Campaigned on (PDF) 80% Below 1990 Levels by 2050 10% Renewable by 2012, 25% Renewable by 2025 100% Auction
What Europe is Doing 20% Below 1990 Levels by 2020, May Bump to 30% Goal of 22% by 2010 Most were Given Away to Polluters Free of Charge
What I think the Bill Should do, at Minimum At least 20% below 1990 Levels by 2020 25% Renewable by 2025 100% Auction

Bottom line: As the American Clean Energy and Security Act clears its first procedural hurdle next week (the House Energy and Commerce Committee), it will have already been significantly weakened. It is simply not as strong as a) Obama’s campaign promises, b) what Europe is doing or c) what scientists say is necessary to prevent catastrophic climate change.

Incredibly, even with massive majorities in both branches of Congress, Democratic Leadership is unable to pass a bill that does what is necessary. As I’ve mentioned previously, polluting industries continue to dominate the legislative process by bankrolling candidates who vote against environmental regulations. This problem will not go away until we fundamentally change Congress.

I’ll reserve judgment on whether I think the package moving through Energy and Commerce is worth supporting until the full details of the agreement are released on Thursday. For the time being I’ll just note that I’m extremely disappointed with the details that have emerged so far. President Obama needs to take steps to ensure that America’s climate policy is taken seriously at the international negotiations this December in Copenhagen. If he intends to expend any political capital to make that a reality he needs to do so now, before so-called moderate Democrats from coal country succeed in making the bill ineffective.